![]() ![]() They are both reflash solutions, so the difference in tuning comes from the map contents itself, and the device in which the map is sent to the car Cobb AP is a proprietary device used solely for ECU-related actions, where the Tactrix (OpenECU) uses a laptop which can be used for ECU-related activities, as well as everything else a computer can. In an effort to keep the thread more technical in nature, if you have a question about which one is better in your situation, please create a new thread (mention you've read this) instead of posting in here. The purpose of this thread is not to debate which one is better, but to outline the differences, allowing the end-user to weigh the pros/cons of each and make an informed decision about which solution works best for them. Therefore, the dilemma ends up being whether an end-user should go with Cobb AP or OpenECU for their engine management needs. Reflash mediums are the most commonly used application, for all but the more complicated setups. One of the most frequent questions users have when starting to research potential engine management solutions is "What do I go with?" Currently TACTRIX OpenPort does not support the 2015+ FA20F WRX in any market ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |